1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS INC. v. SYNOPSYS INC.
 

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS INC. v. SYNOPSYS INC.

Case No. C 11-5973 PSG.

DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, v. SYNOPSYS INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants/Counter-claimant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

September 11, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by J. James Li , LiLaw,Inc, Christopher D. Banys , Banys, P.C., Daniel McArtur Shafer , Banys, P.C., Eric J. Sidebotham , Banys, P.C., Jennifer C. Lu , Banys, P.C. & Richard Cheng-hong Lin , Banys, P.C..

Synopsys, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew Shichen Ong , Orrick Herrington Sutcliff LLP, Benjamin Janda Hofilea, Jr. , Indra Neel Chatterjee , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Jason Yu , Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, Shanee Y. W. Nelson , Synopsys Inc. & Christopher Ryan Ottenweller , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.

Intel Corporation, Miscellaneous, represented by Anthony L Marks , Perkins Coie Brown & Bain P.A..

NVIDIA Corporation, Miscellaneous, represented by Benjamin George Damstedt , Cooley Godward Kronish LLP.

Synopsys, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Andrew Shichen Ong , Orrick Herrington Sutcliff LLP, Benjamin Janda Hofilea, Jr. , Indra Neel Chatterjee , Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Jason Yu , Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, Shanee Y. W. Nelson , Synopsys Inc. & Christopher Ryan Ottenweller , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.

Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by J. James Li , LiLaw,Inc.

FINAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.

In this patent infringement suit, Plaintiff and counter-defendant Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. ("Dynetix") alleges that Defendant and counter-claimant Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,466,898 ("the `898 patent"). Synopsys counterclaims that Dynetix infringes U.S. Patent No. 5,706,473 ("the `473 patent") and U.S. Patent No. 5,784,593 ("the `593 patent"). The parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases