1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 969 F.Supp.2d
  5. 969 F.Supp.2d 1293 (2013)
 

LATIF v. HOLDER

No. 3:10-CV-00750-BR.

969 F.Supp.2d 1293 (2013)

Ayman LATIF, Mohamed Sheikh Abdirahm Kariye, Raymond Earl Knaeble IV, Faisal Nabin Kashem, Elias Mustafa Mohamed, Stephen William Washburn, Abdullatif Muthanna, Nagib Ali Ghaleb, Mashaal Rana, Ibraheim Y. Mashal, Salah Ali Ahmed, Amir Meshal, and Stephen Durga Persaud, Plaintiffs, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; Robert S. Mueller III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Timothy J. Healy, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

August 28, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen M. Wilker , Tonkon Torp LLP, Kevin Diaz , ACLU Foundation of Oregon, Portland, OR, Hina Shamsi , Ben Wizner , Nusrat Jahan Choudhury , American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Mitchell P. Hurley , Christopher M. Egleson , Justin H. Bell , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, New York, NY, Ahilan Arulanantham , Jennifer Pasquarella , ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Alan L. Schlosser , Julia Harumi Mass , ACLU Foundation of Northern California, San Francisco, CA, Laura Schauer Ives , ACLU Foundation of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, Reem Salahi, Salahi Law, Santa Monica, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Eric Holder , United States Attorney General, Diane Kelleher , Lily S. Farel , Amy Elizabeth Powell , Scott A. Risner , United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C, S. Amanda Marshall , United States Attorney, James E. Cox, Jr. , Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, OR, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion (# 85) for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion (# 91) for Partial Summary Judgment. The parties seek summary judgment on Plaintiffs' claims for procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution1 and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 706, in which Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases