1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 963 F.Supp.2d
  5. 963 F.Supp.2d 722 (2013)
 

CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP. v. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN

Case No. 09-cv-10179.

963 F.Supp.2d 722 (2013)

CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party, v. CSX Transportation, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

August 12, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence Z. Shiekman , Pepper, Hamilton, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants.

Matthew J. Lund , Pepper Hamilton LLP, Southfield, MI, for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Third-Party Defendant.

Daniel D. Quick , Dickinson Wright , Troy, MI, Doron Yitzchaki , Dickinson Wright , Ann Arbor, MI, James E. Lozier , Dickinson Wright , Lansing, MI, for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party.

ORDER DENYING GRAND TRUNK'S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR NEW TRIAL OR REMITTITUR [229]

NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.

This case's central issue has been whether Plaintiffs Consolidated Rail Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railroad Company ("Plaintiffs" or "Conrail") had the right to use Defendant Grand Trunk's tracks to cross a property either called...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases