1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 964 F.Supp.2d
  5. 964 F.Supp.2d 355 (2013)
 

IN RE SHOP-VAC MARKETING & SALES PRACTICES LIT.

MDL No. 2380. Civil Action No. 4:12-md-2380.

964 F.Supp.2d 355 (2013)

In re SHOP-VAC MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: all Cases.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

August 9, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian F. Fox , Charles E. Schaffer , Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Scott A. George , Seeger Weiss, LLP, Jonathan Shub , Seeger Weiss LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Jordan L. Chaikin , Parker Waichman LLP, Bonita Springs, FL, J. Christopher Munley , Munley, Munley & Cartwright, P.C., Scranton, PA, Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer, Chicago, IL, Eric D. Holland , R. Seth Crompton , Randall S. Crompton , Holland, Groves, Schneller & Stolze, LLC, St. Louis, MO, Bruce Daniel Greenberg , Lite Depalma Greenberg, LLC, Newark, NJ, Andrei V. Rado , Jennifer S. Czeisler , Sanford P. Dumain , Scott R. Foglietta , Milberg LLP, Robert I. Lax , Lax LLP, New York, NY, Bonner C. Walsh , Walsh, PLLC, Athens, TX, Joseph U. Metz , Dilworth Paxson LLP, Harrisburg, PA, William J. Pinilis , Pinilis Halpern, LLP, Morristown, NJ, Jerrold S. Parker , Parker Waichman Alonso LLP, Great Neck, NY, Caroline F. Bartlett , Carella Byrne , Donald A. Ecklund , James E. Cecchi , Carella Byrne Cecchi Olstein Brody & Agnello PC, Roseland, NJ, Nicholas J. Drakulich , Robert J. Drakulich , The Drakulich Firm APLC, San Diego, CA, Douglas Edward Rushton, Jr. , Richard J. Arsenault , Neblett, Beard & Arsenault, Alexandria, LA, Daniel E. Becnel, Jr. , Matthew B. Moreland , Becnel Law Firm, LLC, Reserve, LA, for Plaintiffs.

Clay Scott, pro se.

Michael Lawrence Mallow , Michael Brian Shortnacy , Loeb & Loeb LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Thomas G. Collins , Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Harrisburg, PA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM

RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

YVETTE KANE, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' consolidated amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 68.) The motion has been fully briefed, and for the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion and dismiss Plaintiffs' consolidated amended complaint without prejudice.

I. BACKGROUND

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases