1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LEE v. GAB TELECOM, INC.
 

LEE v. GAB TELECOM, INC.

Case No. 12-cv-14104.

HORACE LEE, DESHON TAYLOR, and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GAB TELECOM, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

August 8, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horace Lee, Plaintiff, represented by David M. Blanchard , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C., Elizabeth Ann Tully , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C., Harold Lichten , Lichten & Liss-Riordan PC & Edward A. Macey , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C..

Deshon Taylor, Plaintiff, represented by David M. Blanchard , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C., Elizabeth Ann Tully , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C., Harold Lichten , Lichten & Liss-Riordan PC & Edward A. Macey , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C..

Terris Walker, Plaintiff, represented by David M. Blanchard , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C., Edward A. Macey , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C., Elizabeth Ann Tully , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C. & Harold Lichten , Lichten & Liss-Riordan PC.

Dexter Johnson, Plaintiff, represented by David M. Blanchard , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C., Edward A. Macey , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C., Elizabeth Ann Tully , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C. & Harold Lichten , Lichten & Liss-Riordan PC.

James Neff, Plaintiff, represented by Edward A. Macey , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C., Elizabeth Ann Tully , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C. & Harold Lichten , Lichten & Liss-Riordan PC.

Leslie Wardell, Plaintiff, represented by Edward A. Macey , Nacht, Roumel, Salvatore, Blanchard & Walker, P.C., Elizabeth Ann Tully , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C. & Harold Lichten , Lichten & Liss-Riordan PC.

GAB Telecom, Incorporated, Defendant, represented by John E. Gannon , Lambert, Leser, Isackson, Cook & Giunta.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL CLASS NOTICE [#35], DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [#35], DENYING DEFENDANT'S COUNTER-MOTION TO PROHIBIT OPT-INS FROM JOINING CASE [#39], DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR REMOVAL OF INTERNET OR OTHER POSTINGS [#39], GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES [#39], FINDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY MOOT [#39], FINDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH AND LIMIT DISCOVERY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases