JAMES W. GROOMS, JR.,
v.
CITY OF MORRISTOWN, TENNESSEE, ROGER OVERHOLT, VICKIE ARNOLD, JENNY BALL, CHRISTIAN NEWMAN, RON SERGEANT, ESCO JARNIGAN, RONNIE INMAN, JOHN HARVEY, and JAMES COFFEY.
United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Greeneville Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 3, 2013.
July 3, 2013.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James W Grooms, Jr, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
Morristown, Tennessee, City of, Defendant, represented by Benjamin K Lauderback , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC & Elese Courtney Epps , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC.
Roger Overholt, Defendant, represented by Benjamin K Lauderback , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC & Elese Courtney Epps , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC.
Vickie Arnold, Defendant, represented by Benjamin K Lauderback , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC & Elese Courtney Epps , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC.
Jenny Ball Defendant, represented by Benjamin K Lauderback , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC.
Jenny Ball, Defendant, represented by Elese Courtney Epps , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC.
Christian Newman, Defendant, represented by Benjamin K Lauderback , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC & Elese Courtney Epps , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC.
Ron Sergeant, Defendant, represented by Benjamin K Lauderback , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC & Elese Courtney Epps , Watson, Roach, Batson, Rowell & Lauderback PLC.
Esco Jarnigan, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey R Thompson , O'Neil, Parker & Williamson.
Ronnie Inman, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey R Thompson , O'Neil, Parker & Williamson.
John Harvey, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey R Thompson , O'Neil, Parker & Williamson.
James Coffey, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey R Thompson , O'Neil, Parker & Williamson.
United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Greeneville Division.
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
LEON JORDAN, Magistrate Judge.
This pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is before the Court upon defendants' joint motion to dismiss this case, based on plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's order and his failure to participate fully in the discovery process, (Doc. 61). In the prior order, (Doc. 58), the Court discussed defendants' attempts to secure full and complete answers...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
