1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 955 F.Supp.2d
  5. 955 F.Supp.2d 69 (2013)
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. v. INTERLACE MEDICAL, INC.

Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ.

955 F.Supp.2d 69 (2013)

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. v. INTERLACE MEDICAL, INC. and Hologic, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

June 27, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Crosby , Joseph J. Leghorn , Joshua S. Barlow , Maia H. Harris , Michelle A. Flores , Nixon & Peabody, LLP, Boston, MA, Sorinel Cimpoes , Nixon Peabody, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Joel R. Leeman , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, Marc A. Cohn , Matthew M. Wolf , Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, DC, Jennifer Sklenar , Arnold & Porter LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Interlace Medical, Inc. and Hologic, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ZOBEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc. ("S & N"), sued defendants Interlace Medical, Inc., and Hologic, Inc. (collectively "Hologic"),1 for infringing two patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,226,459 ("the '459 patent"), relating to an arthroscopic surgical instrument, and U.S. Patent No. 8,061,359 ("the '359 patent"), relating to a surgical endoscopic cutting device and method for its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases