POTT v. ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC.

Case No. C13-332-RSM.

945 F.Supp.2d 1197 (2013)

In re Application of Alfredo Carlos POTT for Judicial Assistance Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, Plaintiff, v. ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle.

April 30, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Schoeggl , David W. Howenstine , Mills Meyers Swartling, Seattle, WA, Manuel Varela , Lewis Baach PLLC, Washington, DC, for Applicant.

James M. Nelson , Greenberg Traurig LLP, Sacramento, CA, for Intervenor.

David C. Lundsgaard , Graham & Dunn PC, Seattle, WA, for Interested Party.


ORDER ON MOTIONS

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Alfred Carlos Pott's motion to compel (Dkt. # 8), and intervenor Bentinicos de Argentina's ("BDA") motion to quash the subpoena, contained within its responsive memoranda (Dkt. # 19). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DEFERS the motion to compel and DENIES the motion to quash. BDA's remaining motion is STRICKEN as MOOT (Dkt. #15).

I. BACKGROUND<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases