IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. 3:07-MD-1827 SI, No. MDL No. 1827.

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: All Indirect-Purchaser Actions; State of Missouri, et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-3619; State of Florida v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-3517; and State of New York v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 11-cv-0711.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

April 25, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis O. Scarpulla , (41059) Craig C. Corbitt , (83251) Judith A. Zahid , (215418) Patrick B. Clayton , (240191) Qianwei Fu , (242669) Heather T. Rankie , (268002) ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL & MASON LLP, San Francisco, CA. [email protected]

Joseph M. Alioto , (42680) Theresa D. Moore , (99978) ALIOTO LAW FIRM, San Francisco, CA. [email protected] Co-Lead Class Counsel for Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs


[PROPOSED] AMENDED ORDER RE: DISTRIBUTION FROM ESCROW FUNDS FOR CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on December 27, 2011, the Court granted final approval to settlements between the Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs ("IPPs") and the States of Arkansas, California, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New York, West Virginia, and Wisconsin ("Settling States") on the one hand, and defendants Chimei, Chunghwa, Epson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases