ORDER
DANIEL P. JORDAN III, District Judge.
This Title IX sexual-harassment case is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment [14]. Because the Court concludes that most of Plaintiff's claims are time-barred, but there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether his quid pro quo sexual-harassment claim was timely filed, the motion will be granted in part but otherwise denied. The Court also finds...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
