1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 925 F.Supp.2d
  5. 925 F.Supp.2d 868 (2013)
 

COMPOSITE TECH. v. INOPLAST COMPOSITES SA DE CV

Case No. 3:11-cv-00279.

925 F.Supp.2d 868 (2013)

COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. INOPLAST COMPOSITES SA DE CV, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton.

February 26, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sasha Alexa M. Vandegrift , Richard Albert Talda , Coolidge Wall Co., L.P.A., Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff.

Steven Paul Goodin , Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP, Cincinnati, OH, Steven P. Dunn , Howard and Howard Attorneys PPLC, Royal Oak, MI, for Defendant.

ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT INOPLAST'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. #12)

THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.

This matter arises from a business relationship between Plaintiff Composite Technologies, L.L.C. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Inoplast Composites SA DE CV ("Defendant") under which the Plaintiff manufactured and delivered products in response to orders placed by the Defendant. Am. Compl. ¶ 4-5. The Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has failed to pay...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases