1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 925 F.Supp.2d
  5. 925 F.Supp.2d 170 (2013)
 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CORP., INC. v. INSTRON, INC.

Civil Action No. 12-10171-JLT.

925 F.Supp.2d 170 (2013)

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. INSTRON, INC., Tinius Olsen International Co., and MTS Systems Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

February 26, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy M. Cornell , Mueller Law Group, PLLC, Austin, TX, for Advanced Technology Corporation, Inc.

Jill M. Brannelly , Kevin C. Cain , Harvey Weiner, Peabody & Arnold LLP, Jane E. Willis , Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA, for Tinius Olson International Co.

Mark S. Popofsky , Ropes & Gray, Washington, DC, for Instron, Inc.

Robert E. Toone, Jr. , Lisa C. Wood , Foley Hoag LLP, Boston, MA, for MTS Incorporated.

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Advanced Technology Corporation ("ATC") developed an innovative technique for measuring the tensile properties of metallic materials, called Automated Ball Indentation ("ABI"). ATC alleges that its competitors — Defendants Instron Inc. ("Instron"), Tinius Olsen International Co. ("Tinius Olsen"), and MTS Systems Corporation ("MTS") — conspired to maintain their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases