FULGHUM v. EMBARQ CORPORATION

Case No. 07-2602-EFM.

938 F.Supp.2d 1090 (2013)

William Douglas FULGHUM, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. EMBARQ CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

Reconsideration Denied July 16, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan M. Sandals , Scott Michael Lempert , Sandals & Associates, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Amii Castle , Walters Bender Strohbehn & Vaughan, PC, Kansas City, MO, Bruce Keplinger , Christopher J. Lucas , Norris & Keplinger, L.L.C., Overland Park, KS, Diane A. Nygaard , The Nygaard Law Firm, Mary C. O'Connell , R. Douglas Gentile , Douthit, Frets, Rouse, Gentile & Rhodes, LLC, Leawood, KS, Richard T. Seymour , Adele Rapport , Law Office of Richard T. Seymour, PLLC, Washington, DC, Stewart W. Fisher , Jessica E. Leaven , Glenn, Mills, Fisher & Mahoney, PA, Durham, NC, for Plaintiffs.

D. Michelle Morlock, pro se.

Henry John Roehr, pro se.

Jack Bailey, pro se.

Veronica P. Crawley, pro se.

Eunice McNeal, pro se.

Amy Stettler pro se.

Shirley G. Hammock, pro se.

Eleanor E. Huston, pro se.

Vena Rogers, pro se.

Eleanor Wildhab-Daly, pro se.

Darlynn Muhlbach, pro se.

Annette E. Wantz, pro se.

Roger Dennis Hutchison, pro se.

Carolyn Kuklok, pro se.

Diane Phillips, pro se.

Hollis Phillips, pro se.

Mary Sharp Miller, pro se.

Leo Colabauth, pro se.

Valerie Kern, pro se.

Brian K. O'Bleness , Christopher J. Leopold , Mark D. Hinderks , Scott C. Hecht , Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Kansas City, MO, James P. Walsh, Jr. , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Princeton, NJ, Joseph J. Costello , Michael L. Banks , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Christopher J. Koenigs , Michael B. Carroll , Sherman & Howard LLC, Denver, CO, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ERIC F. MELGREN, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.   Contractual Vesting Claims Under ERISA......................................1098

     A. The Parties .............................................................1098

        1. Named Plaintiffs......................................................1098

           a. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Company.............................1098

    ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases