1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 901 F.Supp.2d
  5. 901 F.Supp.2d 1 (2012)
 

IN RE LONG-DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE

Nos. 07-mc-0014 (RCL), 07-cv-0051 (RCL), 07-cv-0050 (RCL), 06-cv-0483 (RCL). MDL No. 1798.

901 F.Supp.2d 1 (2012)

In re LONG-DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE FEDERAL EXCISE TAX REFUND LITIGATION. This Document Relates to Cohen v. United States, Gurrola v. United States, Sloan v. United States.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 29, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark D. Griffin , Griffin Law Firm, Orange, OH, Sidney A. Backstrom , Richard F. Scruggs , Scruggs Law Firm, PA, Oxford, MS, Robert G. Smith , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, San Diego, CA, William H. Anderson , Robert J. Cynkar , Charles J. LaDuca , Jonathan Watson Cuneo , Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP, Washington, DC, Nicholas E. Chimicles , Benjamin F. Johns , Chimicles & Tikellis, LLP, Haverford, PA, Christopher Weld, Jr. , Todd & Weld, LLP, Boston, MA, Kevin T. Peters , Tony & Weld, Boston, MA, Steven N. Berk , Berk Law LLC, Washington, DC, Michael A. Bowen , Foley & Lardner LLP, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff.

Joseph E. Hunsader , Geoffrey John Klimas , Brian H. Corcoran , Christopher James Williamson , U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC, Daniel P. Collins , Burton A. Gross , Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA, Michael K. Kellogg , Sean A. Lev , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Patrick S. Wolleson , Breithaupt, Dunn, DuBos, Shafto & Wolleson, LLC, Monroe, LA, Washington, DC, Sandra Sepulveda , Alejandro N. Mayorkas , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Rebecca Min , Susan L. Saltzstein Skadden , Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY, Michael B. Carlinsky , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Los Angeles, CA, John W. Rogers , Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before this Court is plaintiffs' Motion to Enter Judgment and for an Interim Award of Attorneys' Fees and Litigation Expenses [83]. This Court will GRANT plaintiffs' motion for final judgment in part and DENY the motion in part. The Court will enter final judgment in favor of the Sloan plaintiffs on their procedural APA claim and for the government with respect to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases