1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 905 F.Supp.2d
  5. 905 F.Supp.2d 438 (2012)
 

U.S. v. CITY OF NEW YORK

No. 07-CV-2067 (NGG)(RLM).

905 F.Supp.2d 438 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and The Vulcan Society, Inc., for itself and on behalf of its members, Jamel Nicholson, and Rusebell Wilson, individually and on behalf of a subclass of all other victims similarly situated seeking classwide injunctive relief; Roger Gregg, Marcus Haywood, and Kevin Walker, individually and on behalf of a subclass of all other non-hire victims similarly situated; and Candido Nuñez and Kevin Simpkins, individually and on behalf of a subclass of all other delayed-hire victims similarly situated, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

October 26, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elliot M. Schachner , Michael J. Goldberger , United States Attorneys Office, David Michael Eskew , United States Attorney's Office, Brooklyn, NY, Eric Bachman , Allan K. Townsend , Barbara A. Schwabauer , Meredith L. Burrell , United States Department of Justice, Sharon Seeley , Jennifer Swedish , Kathryn Ladewski , Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Richard A. Levy , Allyson L. Belovin , Dana E. Lossia , Robert H. Stroup , Levy Ratner P.C., Beth A. Kaswan , Judith S. Scolnick , Scott and Scott, LLP, Leon Friedman , Offices of Leon Friedman, Shayana Devendra Kadidal , Darius Charney , Ghita Schwarz , New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Intervenors.

Georgia Mary Pestana , Kathleen Marie Comfrey , Office of the Corporation Counsel, William S.J. Fraenkel , Corporation Counsel of the City of NY, Edward Lee Sample, II , Yuval Rubinstein , New York City Law Department, James Lemonedes , NYC Office of Corporation Counsel, Kami Zumbach Barker , NYC Law Department, Patricia B. Miller , NYC Corporation Counsel, Vivien V. Ranada , The City of New York Law Department, New York, NY, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge.

This Memorandum and Order addresses objections to the court's Proposed Relief Order, made through written submissions and a four-day Fairness Hearing in accordance with the remedial procedures of Title VII and the court's previous orders. The court will assume familiarity with the background and facts of this case.1

The objections process was held so that nonparties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases