1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 887 F.Supp.2d
  5. 887 F.Supp.2d 519 (2012)
 

PERFECT PEARL CO. v. MAJESTIC PEARL & STONE

No. 10 Civ. 3998(PAE).

887 F.Supp.2d 519 (2012)

PERFECT PEARL CO., INC. d/b/a Majestic Pearl Co., Plaintiff, v. MAJESTIC PEARL & STONE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 14, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony F. Lo Cicero , Holly Pekowsky , Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLC, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.

Panagiota Betty Tufariello , Law Offices of P.B. Tufariello, P.C., Selden, NY, for Defendant.

OPINION & ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:

Plaintiff Perfect Pearl Co. ("Perfect") brings claims of unfair competition and false advertising against defendant Majestic Pearl & Stone, Inc. ("Majestic"), under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., and New York common law. It alleges that Majestic has infringed on its exclusive right to use the trademarks MAJESTIC and MAJESTIC PEARL (the "MAJESTIC marks" or the "marks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases