CORNISH v. U.S.

Civil Action No. 09-797 (RWR).

885 F.Supp.2d 198 (2012)

Cornell D.M. Judge CORNISH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

August 15, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, Washington, DC, pro se.

William Mark Nebeker , U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.

Pro se plaintiff Cornell Cornish brings claims against the United States of America, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"), and then-USPTO employees Jon Doll, Harry I. Moatz, and James Toupin, each of whom is sued in his official and individual capacities, arising from the USPTO's decisions to deny Cornish's request for reinstatement to the patent attorney register. The defendants move...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases