1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 883 F.Supp.2d
  5. 883 F.Supp.2d 431 (2012)
 

PEREZ v. METROPOLITAN TRANSP. AUTHORITY

No. 11 Civ. 8655(RWS).

883 F.Supp.2d 431 (2012)

Ada PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, John D'Agostino and Oleg Olshanetskiy, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 7, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wolin & Wolin, by: Alan Edward Wolin, Esq. , Jericho, NY, for Plaintiff.

Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLP, by: Laura Anne Delvecchio, Esq. , Richard Michael Sullivan, Jr., Esq. , New York, NY, for Defendants.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Metropolitan Transportation Authority (the "MTA"), John D'Agostino ("D'Agostino") and Oleg Olshanetskiy ("Olshanetskiy," and, with the MTA and D'Agostino, the "Defendants") have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the amended verified complaint (the "Amended Complaint") of plaintiff Ada Perez ("Perez" or the "Plaintiff") alleging violations of Plaintiff's constitutional rights resulting from urine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases