RICARDO D. CANTRELL, Plaintiff
v.
PAMELA HALE, et al., Defendants
United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 6, 2012.
August 6, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Ricardo D. Cantrell, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
Pamela Hale, Administrator, in her official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
Kevin Cox, Director of Operations, in his official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, In its official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
Metropolitan Government of Nashville Davidson County, In its official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
Lt. William Gise, In his official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
C.O. Mark Lang, In his official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
C.O. Jonathan Sandoval, In his official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
Raymond Flaherty, In his official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
C.O. Hugh Watson, In his official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
C.O. Richard Pickens, In his official and individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
Sheriff Daron Hall, Defendant, represented by Derrick C. Smith , Metropolitan Legal Department.
Danna Williams, Defendant, represented by Paul J. Bruno , Law Office of Paul J. Bruno.
United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.
ORDER
JOE B. BROWN, Magistrate Judge.
Presently pending are two motions in this matter. First, Docket Entry 66 is a motion to extend time for leave to file an amended complaint to June 29, 2012.
Inasmuch as the Plaintiff did not file a motion to amend his complaint with a proposed amendment attached to it by June 29th. That motion (Docket Entry 66) is terminated as MOOT. The Plaintiff, instead of filing a request...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
