1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 830 F.Supp.2d
  5. 830 F.Supp.2d 1071 (2011)
 

SEIKO EPSON CORP. v. GLORY SOUTH SOFTWARE MFG.

No. 3:06-CV-236-BR.

830 F.Supp.2d 1071 (2011)

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation; Epson America, Inc., a California corporation; and Epson Portland, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiffs, v. GLORY SOUTH SOFTWARE MANUFACTURING, INC., a California corporation; Butterfly Print Image Corp., Ltd., a Hong Kong company; Ink Lab (H.K.) Co., Ltd., a Hong Kong company; Nectron International, Ltd., a Texas company; Nine Star Image Co., Ltd., a China company; Nine Star Technology Co., Ltd., a California company; Town Sky, Inc., a California corporation; Zhuhai Gree Magneto-Electric Co., Ltd., a China company; MMC Consumables, Inc., a California company; Tully Imaging Supplies, Ltd., a Hong Kong company; Inkjet Warehouse.Com, Inc., a Connecticut corporation; Wellink Trading Co., Ltd., a China company; Ribbon Tree (Macao) Trading Co., Ltd., a China company; Ribbon Tree (USA), Inc., dba Cana-Pacific Ribbons, Inc., a Washington company; Apex Distributing, Inc., a Washington company; Dataproducts USA, LLC, a California limited liability corporation; Master Ink Co., Ltd., a Hong Kong company; and Acujet U.S.A., INC., a California company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division.

November 15, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Axelrod , Devon Zastrow Newman Schwabe , Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., Portland, OR, Harold A. Barza , J.D. Horton , James Stein , Joseph M. Paunovich , Ryan S. Goldstein , Tigran Guledjian , Valerie Roddy , Justin Brownstone , Lance Yang , Rachael McCracken , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs Seiko Epson Corporation; Epson America, Inc.; and Epson Portland, Inc.

Lei Mei , Mei & Mark LLP, Washington D.C., Seth H. Row , Parsons Farnell & Grein LLP, Portland, OR, Elizabeth H. Rader , Yitai Hu , Alston & Bird LLP, Menlo Park, CA, for Defendants Ninestar Technology Co. Ltd (formerly Ninestar Image Co. Ltd.); Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd.; and Dataproducts USA, LLC.

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion (# 351) for Partial Summary Judgment of Unenforceability of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,917 ('917 Patent) and 6,550,902 ('902 Patent) for Inequitable Conduct filed by Defendants Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd.; Ninestar Technology Co. Ltd; and Dataproducts USA, LLC (collectively referred to as Ninestar) and the Cross-Motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases