1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 879 F.Supp.2d
  5. 879 F.Supp.2d 305 (2012)
 

U.S. v. HAYNESWORTH

No. 12-CR-86 (WFK).

879 F.Supp.2d 305 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Roy HAYNESWORTH, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

July 24, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hilary Ley Jager , United States Attorneys Office, Brooklyn, NY, for Plaintiff.

Deirdre Dionysia Von Dornum , Federal Defenders Division, Brooklyn, NY, for Defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The United States Supreme Court held in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) that no evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search and seizure may be used in a criminal prosecution. Judge, later Justice, Benjamin Cardozo summarized the exclusionary rule in his iconic phrase: "The criminal is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases