1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. STEIDEN v. BIOSURGERY
 

STEIDEN v. BIOSURGERY

Civil Action No. 3:11CV-441-S.

WILLIAM L. STEIDEN, Plaintiff, v. GENZYME BIOSURGERY, A DIVISION OF GENZYME CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville.

July 17, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Steiden, Plaintiff, represented by F. Thomas Conway , Conway & Conway.

Genzyme Biosurgery, a Division of Genzyme Corporation, Defendant, represented by Edward H. Stopher , Boehl Stopher & Graves, LLP — Louisville, Ian Charles Baird Davis , Boehl Stopher & Graves, LLP — Louisville & Jeffrey W. Adamson , Paul A. Casi, II, PSC.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III, District Judge.

On July 6, 2011, William L. Steiden filed suit in the Jefferson Circuit Court against Genzyme Biosurgery, a Division of Genzyme Corporation,1 the manufacturer and seller of Synvisc-One®, a Class III medical device. The Complaint alleges that Synvisc-One® is an unreasonably dangerous product that caused him injury.

Steiden has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases