NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS v. HUSTED

Case No. 2:06-CV-896.

THE NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JON HUSTED, in his official capacity as Secretary of the State of Ohio, Defendant and STATE OF OHIO, Intervenor-Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

July 9, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Subodh Chandra, Interested Party, represented by Alphonse Adam Gerhardstein , Gerhardstein & Branch Co. LPA & John Joseph Kulewicz , Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease — 2.

Thomas E. Niehaus, Interested Party, represented by W Stuart Dornette , Taft Stettinius & Hollister — 1, Beth A. Bryan , Taft Stettinius & Hollister & John B Nalbandian , Taft Stettinius & Hollister — 1.

Louis W. Blessing, Jr., Interested Party, represented by W Stuart Dornette , Taft Stettinius & Hollister — 1, Beth A. Bryan , Taft Stettinius & Hollister & John B Nalbandian , Taft Stettinius & Hollister — 1.

The Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, Plaintiff, represented by Caroline Gentry , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, Ashlie Case Sletvold , Daniel B Miller , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, H. Ritchey Hollenbaugh , Carlile Patchen & Murphy — 2, Jared Michael Klaus , Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP & Paul Gerard Hallinan , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur — 3.

Service Employees International Union, Local 1199, Plaintiff, represented by Caroline Gentry , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, Ashlie Case Sletvold , Barbara J Chisholm , Altshuler Berzon LLP, Pro Hac Vice, Cathrine J Harshman , Hunter Carnahan Shoub & Byard, Daniel B Miller , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, Danielle E Leonard , Altshuler Berzon LLP, Pro Hac Vice, H. Ritchey Hollenbaugh , Carlile Patchen & Murphy — 2, Jared Michael Klaus , Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP, Michael John Hunter , Hunter Carnahan & Shoub & Byard, Paul Gerard Hallinan , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur — 3, Stacey M Leyton , Altshuler Berzon LLP, Pro Hac Vice, Stephen P Berzon , Altshuler Berzon LLP, Pro Hac Vice & Subodh Chandra , The Chandra Law Firm, LLC.

Kyle Wangler, Plaintiff, represented by Caroline Gentry , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, H. Ritchey Hollenbaugh , Carlile Patchen & Murphy — 2, Jared Michael Klaus , Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP, Lindsay M Sestile , Assistant Attorney General, Education Section Ohio Attorney General's Office, Paul Gerard Hallinan , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur — 3 & Subodh Chandra , The Chandra Law Firm, LLC.

Columbus Coalition for the Homeless, Plaintiff, represented by Caroline Gentry , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, H. Ritchey Hollenbaugh , Carlile Patchen & Murphy — 2, Jared Michael Klaus , Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP, Lindsay M Sestile , Assistant Attorney General, Education Section Ohio Attorney General's Office, Paul Gerard Hallinan , Porter Wright Morris & Arthur — 3 & Subodh Chandra , The Chandra Law Firm, LLC.

Ohio Democratic Party, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Donald Joseph McTigue , McTigue & McGinnis LLC, H. Ritchey Hollenbaugh , Carlile Patchen & Murphy — 2, Carl A Aveni, II , Carlile Patchen & Murphy LLP & Mark Alan McGinnis , McTigue & McGinnis LLC.

Jon Husted, in his official capacity as Secretary of the State of Ohio, Defendant, represented by Aaron D Epstein , Ohio Attorney General's Office, Amanda L Scheeser , Ohio Attorney General Employment Law Section, Joseph Norbert Rosenthal , Ohio Attorney General's Office & Sharon A Jennings , Ohio Attorney General Chief Counsel's Staff Section.

Franklin County Board of Elections, Material Witness, represented by Patrick J Piccininni , Ohio Department of Transportation.

Clermont County Board of Elections, Material Witness, represented by Mary Lynne Birck , Prosecuting Attorney's Office.

State Of Ohio, Intervenor, represented by Craig A Calcaterra , Ohio Attorney General's Office, Peggy W Corn , Ohio Attorney General Education Section & David Mark Lieberman , Office of the Ohio Attorney General.


OPINION AND ORDER

ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants' request to vacate the April 22, 2010 Consent Decree (the "Decree," 06-cv-896, Dkt. 210). The Defendants challenged the Decree's validity following this Court's May 10, 2012 Order granting Plaintiffs' Urgent Motion to Enjoin State-Court Proceedings, in which the Court enjoined the Relators' collateral...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases