1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 871 F.Supp.2d
  5. 871 F.Supp.2d 1104 (2012)
 

LAYNE CHRISTENSEN CO. v. BRO-TECH CORP.

Case No. 09-2381-JWL.

871 F.Supp.2d 1104 (2012)

LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY and Dr. Arup K. Sengupta, Plaintiffs, v. BRO-TECH CORPORATION, d/b/a The Purolite Company, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

May 16, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aaron J. Mann , Jeffrey J. Simon , Patrick D. Kuehl, Jr. , Richard R. Johnson , Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiffs.

David R. Barnard , Jason C. Parks , Lathrop & Gage, LLP, Kansas City, MO, Robert C. Sullivan, Jr. , Brian J. Doyle , David Francescani , John S. Goetz , Michael T. Zoppo , Fish & Richardson PC, New York City, NY, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

Over four days beginning on January 24, 2012, the Court conducted a jury trial of the claim by plaintiffs Layne Christensen Company ("Layne") and Arup SenGupta against defendant Bro-Tech Corporation, d/b/a The Purolite Company ("Purolite") for infringement of Claims 1, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 7,291,578 ("the Patent"). All other claims in the case had been resolved by stipulation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases