1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 876 F.Supp.2d
  5. 876 F.Supp.2d 758 (2012)
 

STATE MISSISSIPPI EX REL. HOOD v. AU OPTRONICS CORP.

Cause No. 3:11-CV-345-CWR-FKB.

876 F.Supp.2d 758 (2012)

STATE of MISSISSIPPI ex rel. Jim HOOD, Attorney General, Plaintiff v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION; AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Me Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.; Hannstar Display Corporation; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; Japan Display East, Inc.; LG Display Co.; LG Display America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division.

May 3, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Lee Abraham, Jr. , Preston D. Rideout, Jr. , Abraham & Associates, Greenwood, MS, Carolyn Glass Anderson , Zimmerman Reed, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, Geoffrey C. Morgan , George W. Neville , Meredith McCollum Aldridge , Office of the Attorney General, Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff.

Charles E. Ross , Michael B. Wallace , Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway, James W. Shelson , Luther T. Munford , Phelps Dunbar, LLP, Stephen Lee Thomas , Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Walter H. Boone , Forman, Perry, Watkins, Krutz & Tardy, LLP, John Adam Crawford, Jr. , P. Ryan Beckett , Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, Jackson, MS, Herman J. Hoying , Kent M. Roger , Minna L. Naranjo , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Robert A. Miller , Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, Ridgeland, MS, for Defendants.

ORDER

CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the plaintiff's motion to remand. Docket No. 19. The defendants have responded in opposition, Docket No. 25, the plaintiff has replied, Docket No. 29, and the Court is ready to rule. The motion to remand will be granted. Also pending is the defendants' motion to strike portions of the plaintiff's reply brief. Docket No. 30. That motion is fully briefed, see Docket Nos. 31...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases