TRUSTEES of the NORTHERN NEVADA OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
MACH 4 CONSTRUCTION, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Nevada.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 20, 2012.
April 20, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Trustees-Northern Nevada Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter & Nathan M. Jenkins , Jenkins & Carter.
Trustees-Operating Engineers and Participating Employers Preapprentice, Apprentice, and Journeyman Affirmative Action Training Fund for Northern Nevada, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter & Nathan M. Jenkins , Jenkins & Carter.
Trustees-Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter & Nathan M. Jenkins , Jenkins & Carter.
Trustees-Operating Engineers Vacation and Holiday Pay Plan, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter & Nathan M. Jenkins , Jenkins & Carter.
Trustees-Operating Engineers Pensioned Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter & Nathan M. Jenkins , Jenkins & Carter.
Trustees-Northern Nevada Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Counter Defendant, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter.
Trustees-Operating Engineers and Participating Employers Preapprentice, Apprentice, and Journeyman Affirmative Action Training Fund for Northern Nevada, Counter Defendant, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter.
Trustees-Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Counter Defendant, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter.
Trustees-Operating Engineers Vacation and Holiday Pay Plan, Counter Defendant, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter.
Trustees-Operating Engineers Pensioned Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Counter Defendant, represented by Jerry C. Carter , Jenkins & Carter.
United States District Court, D. Nevada.
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants' motion to strike plaintiffs' post-trial reply brief (Doc. #154). Doc. #155.1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), a court may strike any pleading for redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous material. Here, defendants contend that the court should strike plaintiffs' reply brief because it was filed 4 ½ minutes past the filing deadline. ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
