1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 853 F.Supp.2d
  5. 853 F.Supp.2d 138 (2012)
 

IN RE LONG-DISTANCE TEL. SVC. FED. EXCISE TAX REFUND

Miscellaneous Action No. 07-014 (RMU).

853 F.Supp.2d 138 (2012)

In re LONG-DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE FEDERAL EXCISE TAX REFUND LITIGATION.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

April 10, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark D. Griffin , Griffin Law Firm, Orange, OH, Richard F. Scruggs , Sidney A. Backstrom , Scruggs Law Firm, PA, Oxford, MS, Robert G. Smith , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, San Diego, CA, Jonathan Watson Cuneo , Charles J. Laduca , William H. Anderson , Cuneo Gilbert & Laduca, LLP, Steven N. Berk , Berk Law LLC, Washington, DC, Benjamin F. Johns , Nicholas E. Chimicles , Chimicles & Tikellis, LLP, Haverford, PA, Christopher Weld, Jr. , Kevin T. Peters , Todd & Weld, LLP, Boston, MA, Robert J. Cynkar , Cuneo Gilbert & Laduca, LLP, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiffs.

Brian H. Corcoran , Geoffrey John Klimas , Joseph E. Hunsader , U.S. Department of Justice, Sean A. Lev , Michael K. Kellogg , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, Henk J. Brands , Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, DC, Daniel P. Collins , Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Alejandro N. Mayorkas , Sandra Sepulveda , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Michael B. Carlinsky , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Burton A. Gross , Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA, Patrick S. Wolleson , Breithaupt, Dunn, Du Bos, Shafto & Wolleson, LLC, Monroe, LA, Susan L. Saltzstein , Rebecca Min , Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY, John W. Rogers , Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF MANDATE'S SCOPE; REMANDING TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND PROSPECTIVELY VACATING NOTICE 2006-50

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs challenge the adequacy of a tax refund process instituted by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS" or "the defendant"). The court previously dismissed the plaintiffs' Administrative Procedure Act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases