1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 864 F.Supp.2d
  5. 864 F.Supp.2d 856 (2012)
 

THERASENSE, INC. v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND CO.

Nos. C 04-02123 WHA, C 04-03327 WHA, C 04-03732 WHA, C 05-03117 WHA.

864 F.Supp.2d 856 (2012)

THERASENSE, INC., Plaintiff, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, Defendant. and Consolidated Cases.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

March 27, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clara J. Shin , Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, CA, Martin R. Glick , Gilbert Ross Serota , Douglas Andrew Winthrop , Shaudy Danaye-Elmi , Jasmine K. Singh , Arnold & Porter LLC, San Franciso, CA, for Plaintiff.

Bradford J. Badke , Brian Paul Biddinger , Brandon H. Stroy , Brien P. Santarlas , Neal K. Dahiya , Sanjeev Mehta , Ropes and Gray LLP, New York, NY, Mark D. Rowland , Ropes & Gray LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Mark Daniel Rowland , Gabrielle Elizabeth Higgins, Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER ON REMAND REGARDING INEQUITABLE CONDUCT

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The court of appeals, sitting en banc, vacated a finding herein of inequitable conduct and remanded with instructions to redetermine specified questions under a new standard. Using the new standard, this order again comes to the same conclusion that the patent in suit was procured through inequitable conduct.

STATEMENT

Plaintiff Abbott...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases