U.S. v. GUPTA

No. 11 Cr. 907(JSR). No. 11 Civ. 7566(JSR).

848 F.Supp.2d 491 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America v. Rajat K. GUPTA, Defendant. Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff, v. Rajat K. GUPTA and Raj Rajaratnam, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 26, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reed Michael Brodsky , Richard Craig Tarlowe , U.S. Attorney's Office, New York, NY, for United States of America.

Alan Roy Friedman , David Stanley Frankel , Gary P. Naftalis , Robin Marie Wilcox , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.

That separate government agencies having overlapping jurisdiction will cooperate in the factual investigation of the same alleged misconduct makes perfect sense; but that they can then disclaim such cooperation to avoid their respective discovery obligations makes no sense at all.

During the factual investigation that preceded the bringing of these two actionsa criminal insider trading case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases