TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, ET AL, Plaintiffs,
v.
MYLAN, INC., ET AL, Defendants.
United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 19, 2012.
March 19, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, Plaintiff, represented by David G. Conlin , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE, Gary P. Hunt , Tucker Arensberg & Kathleen B. Carr , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE.
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, represented by David G. Conlin , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE, Gary P. Hunt , Tucker Arensberg & Kathleen B. Carr , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE.
TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., Plaintiff, represented by David G. Conlin , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE, Gary P. Hunt , Tucker Arensberg & Kathleen B. Carr , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE.
TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., Counter Defendant, represented by David G. Conlin , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE, Gary P. Hunt , Tucker Arensberg & Kathleen B. Carr , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE.
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, Counter Defendant, represented by David G. Conlin , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE, Gary P. Hunt , Tucker Arensberg & Kathleen B. Carr , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE.
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Counter Defendant, represented by David G. Conlin , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE, Gary P. Hunt , Tucker Arensberg & Kathleen B. Carr , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, PRO HAC VICE.
WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Counter Defendant, represented by Gary E. Hood , Polsinelli Shughart PC, PRO HAC VICE, Karen M. Zelle , Polsinelli Shughart PC, PRO HAC VICE, Keith J. Grady , Polsinelli Shughart PC, PRO HAC VICE & Richard L. Byrne , The Webb Law Firm.
United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Memorandum Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Transfer (Doc. No. 35)
ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This is an action in patent infringement. Plaintiffs allege that defendants are infringing ten (10) of the plaintiffs' patents and defendants allege, by counterclaim, that an eleventh (11th) patent held by plaintiffs is invalid. Currently pending before this Court is plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
