1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 857 F.Supp.2d
  5. 857 F.Supp.2d 985 (2012)
 

GILMORE v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO.

CIV No. S-09-2180 KJM DAD.

857 F.Supp.2d 985 (2012)

Jeremy GILMORE and Dana Gilmore, Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

March 8, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry Lockshin , Larry Lockshin, Esq. , a Law Corporation, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff.

Naisha Covarrubias , Stephanie Lynn Quinn , Murphy, Campbell, Guthrie & Alliston, Sacramento, CA, Brian W. Plummer , Union Pacific Railroad Law Department, Michael L. Johnson , Union Pacific Law Department, Roseville, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER

KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

I. Background

Plaintiff Jeremy Gilmore alleges, among other things, that he was terminated from his job at Union Pacific Railroad (UP) following a workplace injury. He alleges the termination was based on a general policy of retaliation against injured workers who UP believes will pursue a claim for damages for their injuries. He further alleges the termination also resulted from UP managers receiving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases