1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 853 F.Supp.2d
  5. 853 F.Supp.2d 959 (2012)
 

KELLER v. CITY OF FREMONT

Case Nos. 8:10CV270, 4:10CV3140.

853 F.Supp.2d 959 (2012)

Fred H. KELLER, Jr., Juan Doe, and Juana Doe # 2, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF FREMONT, Dale Shotkoski, in his Official Capacity, and Timothy Mullen, in his Official Capacity, Defendants. Mario Martinez, Jr., Paula Mercado, Martin Mercado, Jane Doe, Maria Roe, Steven Dahl, ACLU Nebraska Foundation, United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 22, and Blake Harper, Plaintiffs, v. City of Fremont; Dale Shotkoski, in his Official Capacity as Fremont City Attorney; and Timothy Mullen, in his Official Capacity as Fremont Chief of Police, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska.

February 20, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aaron J. Siebert-Llera , Alonzo Rivas , Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Chicago, IL, Nicholas D. Espiritu , Victor G. Viramontes , Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Los Angeles, CA, Shirley A. Mora James , Mora James Law, Lincoln, NE, for Plaintiffs in Case No. 8:10CV270.

Jennifer Chang Newell , Kenneth J. Sugarman , Lucas E. Guttentag , American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, San Francisco, CA; Alan E. Peterson ; Amy A. Miller , American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Nebraska; Michelle L. Sitorius , Terry R. Wittler , Cline, Williams Law Firm, Lincoln, NE; Michael A. Nelsen , Marks, Clare Law Firm, Omaha, NE, for Plaintiffs in Case No. 4:10CV3140.

Garrett R. Roe , Immigration Reform Law Institute, Washington, DC, Kris W. Kobach , Immigration Reform Law Institute, Kansas City, KS, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAURIE SMITH CAMP, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are the Plaintiffs' Motions for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 151 in Case No. 4:10cv3140, and Filing No. 161 in Case No. 8:10cv270) and Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 157 in Case No. 4:10cv3140, and Filing No. 130 in Case No. 8:10cv270). The Plaintiffs ask the Court to declare invalid Ordinance No. 5165 (the "Ordinance") amending the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases