IANTOSCA v. BENISTAR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC.

Civil Action No. 08-11785-NMG.

797 F.Supp.2d 184 (2011)

Joseph IANTOSCA, Individually and as Trustee of the Faxon Heights Apartments Realty Trust and Fern Realty Trust, Belridge Corporation, Gail A. Cahaly, Jeffrey M. Johnston, Bellemore Associates, LLC, and Massachusetts Lumber Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. BENISTAR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC., Daniel Carpenter, Molly Carpenter, Benistar Property Exchange Trust Company, Inc., Benistar Ltd., Benistar Employer Services Trust Corporation, Carpenter Financial Group, LLC, Step Plan Service Inc., Benistar Insurance Group, Inc., and Benistar 419 Plan Services Inc., Defendants, Travelers Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Reach and Apply Defendants. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and All Participating Insurers and Syndicates, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Wayne H. Bursey, Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration In Part August 1, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony R. Zelle , Thomas W. Evans , Zelle McDonough & Cohen LLP, Colleen C. Cook , William C. Nystrom , Nystrom Beckman & Paris LLP, John E. O'Brien, Jr. , Robinson & Cole LLP, Boston, MA, for Plaintiffs.

Sean T. Carnathan , Benjamin S. Kafka , O'Connor, Carnathan and Mack LLC, Burlington, MA, Gary R. Greenberg , Sebastian R. Colley , Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Boston, MA, Joseph M. Pastore, III , Fox Rothschild LLP, Stamford, CT, Ira B. Silverstein , Thorp Reed & Armstrong, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants.

Robert L. Ciociola , Litchfield Cavo , Lynnfield, MA, for Reach and Apply Defendants.

Kenneth W. Erickson , Ropes & Gray, Boston, MA, for Third-Party Plaintiff.

Benjamin S. Kafka , O'Connor, Carnathan and Mack LLC, Burlington, MA, for Third-Party Defendant.


ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

This case arises from the plaintiffs' effort to recover a multimillion dollar Massachusetts state court judgment against some of the defendants. The parties are once again embroiled in a dispute over depositions that plaintiffs desire to conduct. In its most recent Memorandum & Order, in February, 2011 (Docket No. 207), the Court held that certain defendants must appear for their depositions before March 31, 2011 and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases