1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 847 F.Supp.2d
  5. 847 F.Supp.2d 982 (2012)
 

MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. S.J. LOUIS CONST., INC.

Civil Action No. 2:11-235-DCR.

847 F.Supp.2d 982 (2012)

MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO., Plaintiff, S.J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Sunoco Pipeline, L.P., Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Northern Division, at Covington.

January 24, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian M. Johnson , Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, Lexington, KY, Debra Djupman , Jay M. Levin , Reed Smith, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Kathleen M.K. Owen , Reed Smith, LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff/Third-Party Defendant.

Christopher David Wiest , Cincinnati, OH, for Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge.

This matter is pending for consideration of defendant S.J. Louis Construction, Inc.'s ("S. J. Louis") motion to dismiss. [Record No. 14] S.J. Louis asserts that Defendant Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. ("Mid-Valley") is not entitled to indemnification or reimbursement for any fines imposed under the Clean Water Act. It also argues that Counts I and II of the Complaint — both of which assert claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases