PICARD v. KATZ

No. 11 Civ. 3605(JSR).

466 B.R. 208 (2012)

Irving H. PICARD, Plaintiff, v. Saul B. KATZ, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 17, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fernando A. Bohorquez, Jr. , David J. Sheehan , Baker & Hostetler, LLP, New York City, NY, Karin Scholz Jenson , Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff

Dana Meredith Seshens , Karen E. Wagner , Davis Polk & Wardwell, L.L.P., New York, NY, for Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.

No principle of federal jurisprudence has proved more efficacious than the "final judgment rule," by which a district court's interim rulings may not normally be appealed until the case is over and final judgment rendered. Naturally, any party that loses an important interim ruling wants to appeal immediately, believing that a parade of horribles will follow if the district court's supposed error is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases