InCOMPASS IT, INC. v. XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.

Civil No. 10-3864 (SRN/JJG).

InCompass IT, Inc., and HLI, L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. XO Communications Services, Inc., and XO Communications, L.L.C., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

January 5, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred M. Stanbury , Stanbury Law Firm, P.A., 2209 St. Anthony Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418, for Plaintiffs

Charles K. Maier & Kelly Hoversten, Gray Plant Mooty Mooty & Bennett, P.A., 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 500, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, for Defendants


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 58] and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 81]. For the reasons set forth herein, the parties' motions are denied.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This action for promissory estoppel arises out of an alleged oral agreement between Plaintiffs InCompass...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases