1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 838 F.Supp.2d
  5. 838 F.Supp.2d 577 (2011)
 

HOWARD v. CUMBERLAND RIVER COAL CO.

Civil No. 11-78-ART.

838 F.Supp.2d 577 (2011)

Charles Scott HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. CUMBERLAND RIVER COAL CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division, Pikeville.

December 20, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Wesley Addington , Whitesburg, KY, Tony Oppegard , Lexington, KY, for Plaintiff.

Mindy G. Barfield , Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Lexington, KY, Rebecca L. Springer , Thomas P. Gies , Washington, DC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.

Charles Scott Howard alleges that Cumberland River Coal Company violated Kentucky state law by laying him off in retaliation for reporting Cumberland's unsafe mining practices. But because Howard's claim requires construing and applying the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, it is preempted by the LMRA. Unfortunately for Howard, he brought his claim nearly a year and a half too late...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases