1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 830 F.Supp.2d
  5. 830 F.Supp.2d 1 (2011)
 

INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. PALM INC.

Civ. No. 07-272-SLR.

830 F.Supp.2d 1 (2011)

INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Plaintiff, v. PALM INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

December 19, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esquire and Rodger Dallery Smith, II, Esquire of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE. Counsel for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant. Of Counsel: Carson P. Veach, Esquire , Leland W. Hutchinson, Jr., Esquire , David S. Becker, Esquire and Jacob D. Koering, Esquire of Freeborn & Peters LLP.

Richard L. Horwitz, Esquire and David Ellis Moore, Esquire of Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE. Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. Of Counsel: Robert T. Haslam, Esquire , Michael M. Markman, Esquire , and Robert J. Williams, Esquire of Covington & Burling LLP.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On May 18, 2007, Intermec Technologies Corporation ("Intermec" or "plaintiff") filed an action against Palm, Inc. ("Palm" or "defendant") for infringement of five U.S. patents ("the Intermec patents"). (D.I. 1) In its third amended answer, Palm asserted infringement of Palm's U.S. Patent Nos. 6,665,803 ("the '803 patent") and 7,096,049 ("the '049 patent", collectively "the Palm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases