1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 866 F.Supp.2d
  5. 866 F.Supp.2d 1024 (2011)
 

METSO MINERALS INDUS. v. JOHNSON CRUSHERS INTERN.

Case No. 10-C-0951.

866 F.Supp.2d 1024 (2011)

METSO MINERALS INDUSTRIES, INC. and Metso Minerals (France) S.A., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON CRUSHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Astec Industries, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

November 28, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David R. Cross , Johanna M. Wilbert , Raymond D. Jamieson , Quarles & Brady LLP, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiffs.

David Aaron Love , Richard W. Bethea, Jr. , John G. Jackson , Chambliss Bahner & Stophel PC, Chattanooga, TN, Joseph A. Kromholz , Melissa S. Hockersmith , Ryan Kromholz & Manion SC, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER

LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.

John Crushers International, Inc. and Astec Industries, Inc. (together, "JCI") claim that Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. and Metso Minerals (France) S.A. (together "Metso") have infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,032,886 (the "'886 patent"). The present opinion contains my claim construction. I also address Metso's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity.

I. BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases