1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 821 F.Supp.2d
  5. 821 F.Supp.2d 308 (2011)
 

SPRINT NEXTEL CORP. v. AT & T INC.

Civil Action Nos. 11-1600 (ESH), 11-1690 (ESH).

821 F.Supp.2d 308 (2011)

SPRINT NEXTEL CORP., Plaintiff, v. AT & T INC., et al., Defendants. Cellular South, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AT & T Inc., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

November 2, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven C. Sunshine , Tara Shaun Emory , Tara L. Reinhart , Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, Gregory Bestor Craig , Skadden Arps, Washington, DC, James A. Keyte , Matthew P. Hendrickson , Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.

Mark C. Hansen , Aaron Martin Panner , James M. Webster , Michael K. Kellogg , Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd & Evans, PLLC, Washington, DC, Mark W. Nelson , George S. Cary , Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

These are antitrust cases between competing mobile wireless carriers. Before the Court are motions to dismiss lawsuits which Sprint and Cellular South brought to enjoin AT & T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile. AT & T and T-Mobile move for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing that Sprint's and Cellular South's complaints fail...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases