1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 827 F.Supp.2d
  5. 827 F.Supp.2d 384 (2011)
 

GENTEX CORP. v. SUTTER

Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-1269.

827 F.Supp.2d 384 (2011)

GENTEX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Brad SUTTER, Patrick Walko, BAE Systems Aerospace & Defense Group Inc., BAE Systems AH Inc. and BAE Systems Specialty Defense Systems of Pennsylvania Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

October 24, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel T. Brier , Donna A. Walsh , Myers Brier & Kelly, LLP, Scranton, PA, Edward F. Mannino , Mannino Law Firm, Plymouth Meeting, PA, for Plaintiff.

Gino J. Benedetti , Dilworth Paxson LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Frank J. Tunis , George A. Reihner , Wright & Reihner, P.O., Scranton, PA, Dana M. Susman , Jeffrey H. Daichman , Lauren M.K. Dayton , Robert L. Sacks , Kane Kessler, PC, New York, NY, David R. Fine , K&L Gates LLP, Harrisburg, PA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM

A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. Default judgment against Defendants Brad Sutter and Patrick Walko1 is appropriate based on their intentional destruction of relevant evidence, so the Plaintiff's motion will be granted in part. But because genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether the Defendant Corporations engaged in spoliation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases