1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 814 F.Supp.2d
  5. 814 F.Supp.2d 261 (2011)
 

CITIZENS AGAINST CASINO GAMBLING v. STEVENS

No. 09-CV-0291S.

814 F.Supp.2d 261 (2011)

CITIZENS AGAINST CASINO GAMBLING IN ERIE COUNTY (Joel Rose and Robert Heffern, as Co-Chairpersons), Rev. G. Stanford Bratton, D. Min., Executive Director of the Network of Religious Communities, Network of Religious Communities, National Coalition Against Gambling Expansion, Preservation Coalition of Erie County, Inc., Coalition Against Gambling in New York—Action, Inc., the Campaign for Buffalo—History Architecture and Culture, Assemblyman Sam Hoyt, Maria Whyte, Erie County Legislator, John McKendry, Shelley McKendry, Dominic J. Carbone, Geoffrey D. Butler, Elizabeth F. Barrett, Julie Cleary, Erin C. Davison, Alice E. Patton, Maureen C. Schaeffer, Dora Richardson, and Josephine Rush, Plaintiffs, v. Tracie STEVENS, in her Official Capacity as Chairwoman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, the National Indian Gaming Commission, the United States Department of the Interior, Ken Salazar, in his Official Capacity as the Secretary of the Interior, and Barack Obama, in Official Capacity as President of the United States, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

August 30, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cornelius D. Murray , O'Connell & Aronowitz, P.C., Albany, NY, Michael L. Jackson , Rachel E. Jackson , Jackson & Jackson LLP, Richard J. Lippes , Richard J. Lippes & Associates, Richard G. Berger , Robert E. Knoer , The Knoer Group, PLLC, Buffalo, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Gina Louise Allery , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Mary Pat Fleming , U.S. Attorney's Office, Buffalo, NY, for Defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER

WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On March 31, 2009, Plaintiffs commenced this action challenging the legality of a gambling casino operated by the Seneca Nation of Indians ("SNI") in the City of Buffalo on land it acquired in 2005 (the "Buffalo Parcel").

Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Compelling Production of Administrative Record Documents and Authorizing Discovery to Supplement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases