MILLIKEN & CO. v. BANK OF CHINA

No. 09 Civ. 6123 (LMM).

758 F.Supp.2d 238 (2010)

MILLIKEN & COMPANY, Petitioner, v. BANK OF CHINA, Respondent/Bank. Haima Group Corporation, Weihai No. 1 Carpet Factory and Weihai Haima Carpet Co., Ltd., Respondent/Judgment Debtors.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 6, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennifer Lindsay Rubin , Akerman Senterfitt , LLP, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Christopher Brady , Hollyer Brady , Smith and Hynes, Lanier Saperstein , Pamela Rogers Chepiga , Allen & Overy, LLP, New York, NY, for Respondent/Bank.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McKENNA, District Judge.

Respondent Bank of China ("Bank") objects, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, to a Memorandum and Order of Magistrate Judge Francis, dated August 11, 2010, which denied the Bank's motion for a protective order, precluded the Bank from asserting any lien on an account with the Bank superior to that of petitioner, and required the Bank to produce certain documents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases