MIDDLESEX MUT. ASSUR. CO. v. FISH

No. CV-09-375-B-W.

738 F.Supp.2d 124 (2010)

MIDDLESEX MUTUAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. Dorothy M. FISH, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

August 24, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Whitman , Richardson, Whitman, Large & Badger, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant.

Steven D. Silin , Robert Furbish , Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

This case is an example of the occasionally counterintuitive world of insurance contract law. To secure insurance coverage, the injured party, Dorothy M. Fish, argues that the tortfeasor was not an insured and therefore Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company (Middlesex) must cover her injuries, and to avoid indemnifying Ms. Fish, Middlesex argues that the tortfeasor was an insured and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases