1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 804 F.Supp.2d
  5. 804 F.Supp.2d 210 (2011)
 

D.O. EX REL. C.O. v. BORDEN

Civil Action No. 10-cv-2339 (NLH) (AMD).

804 F.Supp.2d 210 (2011)

D.O. and M.O., on behalf of C.O., a minor child, M.W. and G.W., on behalf of C.W., a minor child, and J.G. individually, Plaintiffs, v. Edward F. BORDEN, Jr., Haddonfield Police Department, and Borough of Haddonfield, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

March 31, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hercules Pappas, Esquire and Matthew S. Wolf, Esquire , Pappas & Wolf, L.L.C., Haddon Heights, NJ, for Plaintiffs D.O. and M.O., M.W. and G.W., and J.G.

John Charles Gillespie, Esquire , Parker McCay, P.A., Marlton, NJ, Mario A. Iavicoli, Esquire , Haddonfield, N.J., for Defendants Edward F. Borden, Jr., Haddonfield Police Department, and Borough of Haddonfield.

OPINION

HILLMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, D.O. and M.O., on behalf of their minor child C.O., M.W. and G.W., on behalf of their minor child, C.W., and J.G., individually,1 filed a putative class action suit in this Court against Defendants, Edward J. Borden, Jr., a Commissioner and the Public Safety Director of the Borough of Haddonfield, the Haddonfield Police Department, and the Borough of Haddonfield. According to Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases