CLERMONT v. CONTINENTAL CAS. CO.

C.A. No. 10-cv-10595-MAP.

778 F.Supp.2d 133 (2011)

Adam P. CLERMONT, Esquire, Plaintiff/Defendant-in-Counterclaim v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., Defendant/Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim v. Freedman, DeRosa & Rondeau LLP.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

March 29, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam P. Clermont , APC Law, Pittsfield, MA, pro se.

Frank E. Antonucci , Antonucci & Associates, Lenox, MA, for Plaintiff/Defendant-in-Counterclaim.

John G. O'Neill , Sugarman, Rogers, Barshak & Cohen, Boston, MA, for Defendant/Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim.


REVISED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFF'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE1 (Dkt. Nos. 29, 33, & 40)

PONSOR, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case arises out of a fee dispute between Plaintiff, Attorney Adam Clermont, and his former employer, law firm Freedman, DeRosa & Rondeau, LLP ("FDR").

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases