SHAMROCK MARKETING v. BRIDGESTONE BANDAG, LLC

Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-74-H.

775 F.Supp.2d 972 (2011)

SHAMROCK MARKETING, INC., Plaintiff v. BRIDGESTONE BANDAG, LLC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky.

March 11, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Stephen Pitt , Merrill S. Schell , Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, LLP, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiff.

Michael M. Denbow , O. Scott Barber, III , Philip W. Collier , Stites & Harbison, PLLC, Louisville, KY, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, District Judge.

Shamrock Marketing, Inc. ("Shamrock") filed a four-count complaint against Bridgestone Bandag, LLC ("Bandag"), alleging that Bandag implemented a tying arrangement that unlawfully restrains competition in violation of Section 1 (15 U.S.C. § 1) and Section 2 (15 U.S.C. § 2) of the Sherman Act. Bandag has moved to dismiss Shamrock's claims on the grounds that Shamrock lacks standing to bring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases