1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 764 F.Supp.2d
  5. 764 F.Supp.2d 787 (2011)
 

LEBRON v. RUMSFELD

Case No. 2:07-410-RMG.

764 F.Supp.2d 787 (2011)

Estela LEBRON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division.

February 17, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan Marc Freiman , National Litigation Project, Hope R. Metcalf , Yale Law School, Tahlia Townsend, Wiggin and Dana, New Haven, CT, Michael P. O'Connell , Stirling O'Connell and Pennington, Charleston, SC, Alexander Abraham Abdo , Benjamin Elihu Wizner , American Civil Liberties Union, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Joseph P. Griffith, Jr. , Joseph P. Griffith Law Firm, Lee Ellis Berlinsky , U.S. Attorneys Office, Edward Bart Daniel , Matthew R. Hubbell , John Phillips Linton , Seth Warren Whitaker , Duffy and Young, William C. Cleveland , Buist Moore Smythe and McGee, Charleston, SC, Darian Ronald Bartram , David Rivkin , Lee Casey , Baker and Hostetler, William Scott Simpson , U.S. Department of Justice, Jacqueline Gerson Cooper , Richard Douglas Klingler , Sidley Austin , Jamil N. Jaffer , Kevin Brent Huff , Wan Joo Kim , Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans and Figel, Charles S. Leeper , Michael Reilly Miner , Drinker Biddle and Reath, James E. Sherry , Paul W. Butler , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld, David E. Bell , Michael L. Martinez , Crowell and Moring, Edward C. Reddington , Frank Gregory Bowman , Williams and Connolly, Washington, DC, Jennifer J. Aldrich , U.S. Attorneys Office, Elizabeth Van Doren Gray , Bess Jones Durant , Tina Marie Cundari , Sowell Gray Stepp and Laffitte, Columbia, SC, Beattie B. Ashmore , Beattie B. Ashmore Law Office, William Alexander Coates , Roe Cassidy Coates and Price, Henry L. Parr, Jr , Wyche Burgess Freeman and Parham, Greenville, SC, for Defendants.

ORDER

RICHARD MARK GERGEL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims, asserting, inter alia, that no valid cause of action exists in this matter under the principles of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) and its progeny and that they are entitled to qualified immunity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases