1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 764 F.Supp.2d
  5. 764 F.Supp.2d 756 (2011)
 

NATIONAL CAS. CO. v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP.

Civil Action No. AW-05-1992.

764 F.Supp.2d 756 (2011)

NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division.

February 14, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Bartlett, III , Alexander M. Giles , Richard Antoine Tabuteau , Semmes Bowen and Semmes PC, Baltimore, MD, Matthew Clayton Crane , Bauer Moynihan and Johnson LLP, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff.

Anthony Peter Ashton , Dla Piper LLP US, Robert A. Gaumont , Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice PLLC, Baltimore, MD, Edward P. Grosz , Jocelyn L. Jacobson , Leo G. Kailas , Reitler Kailas and Rosenblatt LLC, New York, NY, for Defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.

One of the central legal questions in this case is the proper standard for assessing "want of due diligence" within the meaning of the Liner Negligence Clause ("LNC") of the insurance policy. Lockheed Martin has taken exception to several of the Court's final jury instructions, in particular the instruction defining want of due diligence.1 In addition to the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases