1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 753 F.Supp.2d
  5. 753 F.Supp.2d 1334 (2011)
 

PAKFOOD PUBLIC CO. LTD. v. U.S.

Slip Op. 11-6. Consol. Court No. 09-00430.

753 F.Supp.2d 1334 (2011)

PAKFOOD PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants.

United States Court of International Trade.

January 18, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Trade Pacific PLLC ( Robert G. Gosselink and Jonathan M. Freed ) for Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors Pakfood Public Co., Ltd.; Asia Pacific (Thailand) Co., Ltd.; Chaophraya Cold Storage Co., Ltd.; Okeanos Co., Ltd.; Okeanos Food Co., Ltd.; and Takzin Samut Co., Ltd.

White & Case LLP, Washington, DC ( Walter J. Spak and Jay C. Campbell ) for Consolidated Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors Andaman Seafood Co., Ltd.; Chanthaburi Frozen Food Co., Ltd.; Chanthaburi Seafoods Co., Ltd.; Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd.; Phatthana Frozen Food Co., Ltd.; Thailand Fishery Cold Storage Public Co., Ltd.; Thai International Seafoods Co., Ltd.; Sea Wealth Frozen Food Co., Ltd.; and Rubicon Resources, LLC.

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC ( Warren E. Connelly and Jarrod M. Goldfeder ) for Consolidated Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors Thai Union Frozen Products Public Co., Ltd. and Thai Union Seafood Co., Ltd.

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP ( Andrew W. Kentz and Nathaniel J. Maandig Rickard ) for Consolidated Plaintiff and Defendant-Intervenor Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee.

Stewart and Stewart ( Geert M. De Prest and Elizabeth J. Drake ) and Leake & Andersson, LLP ( Edward T. Hayes ) for Consolidated Plaintiff-Intervenor and Defendant-Intervenor The Domestic Processors.

Tony West , Assistant Attorney General; Jeanne E. Davidson , Director; Patricia M. McCarthy , Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice ( Stephen C. Tosini ), and, of counsel, Jonathan M. Zielinski , Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Administration, Department of Commerce, for Defendant United States.

OPINION

POGUE, Chief Judge:

This action is again before the court following a remand to the United States Department of Commerce ("Commerce" or "the Department") of the results of an administrative review of an antidumping ("AD") duty order.2 The three issues presented are whether, in the selection of respondents in this review, Commerce's use of data obtained from United States Customs and Border Protection ("Customs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases